Examining the Leading Female Characters in Ibsen's Hedda Gabler and Tremblay's Les Belles-Sœurs

Introduction
Henrik Ibsen’s Hedda Gabler (1890) and Michel Tremblay’s Les Belles-Sœurs (1968) are two powerful plays that offer deep insights into the lives of women under societal pressures. Despite their differing cultural contexts—Hedda Gabler being set in Norway and Les Belles-Sœurs in French Canada—both plays highlight the struggles of women who are constrained by the expectations and limitations placed on them by their respective societies. At the heart of both plays are the leading female characters: Hedda Gabler in Ibsen's play and Germaine Lauzon in Tremblay’s. While both women are in starkly different social settings, their struggles, desires, and conflicts reveal common themes such as gender roles, social expectations, and the quest for autonomy.

This comparison will explore how Ibsen and Tremblay present these characters, focusing on their motivations, societal constraints, and the dynamics between the characters and their environments. Through the examination of these two women, we can explore how literature reflects the impact of cultural and societal norms on women’s lives, particularly in relation to marriage, ambition, and identity.


1. Hedda Gabler: The Struggle for Power and Autonomy

  1. Characterization:
    In Hedda Gabler, the title character, Hedda, is an aristocratic woman who seems to have it all—beauty, intelligence, and social status. Yet, she is deeply dissatisfied and restless. Hedda’s marriage to Jørgen Tesman, a scholar, has trapped her in a life that she finds boring and conventional. She yearns for freedom, excitement, and control over her life, yet is unable to find any outlet for her desires within the rigid societal expectations placed on her as a woman. Hedda is an intensely complex character, full of contradictions—she wants power, but she cannot achieve it in the traditional male-dominated spheres of society.

    • Themes of Power and Control:
      Hedda’s actions throughout the play reveal her desire for control and manipulation. She seeks to manipulate those around her—particularly Ejlert Lövborg and Thea Elvsted—in order to bring excitement to her otherwise predictable life. Her destructive tendencies, including her involvement in Lövborg’s demise and her ultimate suicide, reflect the tragic consequences of unfulfilled desires for autonomy. Her inability to act decisively in the world of men leads her to destroy herself, highlighting the suffocating nature of the patriarchal constraints on women in 19th-century society.

  2. Societal Constraints and Gender Roles:
    Hedda's character embodies the struggle of women who are marginalized by the roles they are expected to fulfill in society. The restrictions of marriage, combined with her inability to pursue her own ambitions, lead Hedda to feel like a prisoner in her own life. Ibsen critiques the ways in which women are denied agency in a society that prioritizes male success and leadership. Hedda’s refusal to conform to traditional female expectations (e.g., being a nurturing wife or mother) results in her becoming alienated, even from those closest to her.


2. Germaine Lauzon: A Desire for Escape Through Materialism

  1. Characterization:
    Germaine Lauzon, the leading character in Les Belles-Sœurs, is a middle-class housewife in French Canada. Unlike Hedda’s aristocratic background, Germaine's aspirations are more grounded in the realm of materialism and social mobility. At the beginning of the play, Germaine wins a staggering number of trading stamps, and the play focuses on her attempts to redeem her social standing and acquire the material goods she has long desired. Germaine, however, is not just motivated by materialism—she seeks escape from her mundane, oppressive domestic life. Despite her seemingly shallow desire for consumer goods, Germaine’s character is an exploration of discontent and frustration with the limitations placed on women in her social class.

    • Themes of Social and Domestic Constraints:
      Germaine’s life revolves around the traditional roles of wife and mother, and she is deeply dissatisfied with these roles. Her frustration is compounded by the fact that her family’s financial difficulties prevent her from escaping her role. Like Hedda, Germaine is trapped in her domestic sphere, yet she expresses this constraint through materialistic desires rather than Hedda’s intellectual and emotional yearning for control. Her character reflects the economic limitations that many women face, especially those who feel powerless to change their circumstances. Germaine's attempt to redeem her social status through consumerism is an attempt to gain some control over her life, even if it is only in the form of superficial material success.

  2. Community and Female Relationships:
    Unlike Hedda, Germaine’s relationships with other women play a central role in the narrative. In Les Belles-Sœurs, the focus is on a group of working-class women who are gathered at Germaine’s house to help with her trading stamp project. This scene highlights the shared experiences of women in a patriarchal society, and the dynamics between these characters are full of tension, envy, and competition. Germaine’s interactions with the other women reveal the underlying dissatisfaction of her life. While the women share a collective struggle, their relationships are often characterized by rivalry and resentment, showing how societal pressures force women to compete for limited resources or status.


3. Contrasting Reactions to Societal Norms: Hedda vs. Germaine

  1. Rejection of Traditional Female Roles:
    Both Hedda Gabler and Germaine Lauzon reject the traditional roles of women as wives and mothers. However, their responses to these roles are starkly different. Hedda’s rejection of societal expectations is total, as she refuses to embrace motherhood and marriage in the conventional sense. In contrast, Germaine, although dissatisfied with her housewife duties, clings to the hope that through material success, she can escape her circumstances. Both characters’ desire to transcend their roles highlights the limited options available to women in their respective societies, yet their methodologies diverge—Hedda’s approach is more destructive, while Germaine’s is rooted in the hope of material gain.

  2. The Tragic Ending vs. The Climactic Confrontation:
    Hedda’s tragic end—her suicide—serves as a commentary on the consequences of unfulfilled desires for freedom in a society that oppresses women. She is unable to escape the limitations imposed upon her, leading her to make the ultimate choice to end her life. Germaine’s ending in Les Belles-Sœurs, though more playful and frustrating, suggests that her escape through consumerism is ultimately futile. Her dream of redemption is never fully realized, and the play ends with a sense of unresolved tension. Germaine does not meet a tragic death, but rather a frustrated, anticlimactic end as she realizes that material success cannot solve her deeper problems.


4. Themes of Feminism and Empowerment

  1. Hedda Gabler as a Feminist Icon:
    Hedda’s role in the play has been interpreted as a commentary on the limitations placed on women in a patriarchal society. Her struggle for freedom, though tragic, exposes the gender inequities of the time. Hedda seeks empowerment but is ultimately unable to attain it within the confines of marriage and societal expectations. Her character has often been read as a proto-feminist figure who challenges the status quo but is ultimately destroyed by it.

  2. Germaine Lauzon and Working-Class Feminism:
    While Germaine’s struggles are different from Hedda’s, they still reflect the gender expectations that limit women’s opportunities. Germaine’s materialistic desires may seem shallow, but they represent her desire for agency and escape from her oppressive role. Germaine’s narrative suggests that, for many working-class women, economic independence is key to empowerment, and her pursuit of material gain represents a search for control over her life.


Conclusion

Both Hedda Gabler and Germaine Lauzon are complex characters whose lives are shaped by the pressures and constraints of the societies in which they live. Through Hedda, Ibsen presents the tragic consequences of a woman who cannot reconcile her desire for freedom with the confines of patriarchal roles, while Tremblay’s Germaine reveals the ways in which materialism can be a response to economic and social constraints. Despite their differences, both characters reflect the limited choices available to women and the struggles for autonomy and identity within a society that restricts their freedom. Through their stories, both Ibsen and Tremblay offer valuable insights into the gender inequalities of their time, making their works timeless in their exploration of female identity and empowerment.