Analysis of Hidden Figures (2016) – Examining Instances of Time Wastage

Analysis of Hidden Figures (2016) – Examining Instances of Time Wastage

Hidden Figures (2016), directed by Theodore Melfi, is a powerful historical drama that tells the true story of three African-American women—Katherine Johnson, Dorothy Vaughan, and Mary Jackson—who made crucial contributions to NASA’s space program during the 1960s. The film highlights their struggles against both racial and gender discrimination while showcasing their mathematical brilliance and determination.

While Hidden Figures is widely praised for its inspirational story and performances, evaluating it from the perspective of "time wastage" involves looking for moments or elements in the film that either detract from the central narrative or could be considered unnecessary in terms of pacing and the overall progression of the plot.

1. Unnecessary Subplots or Characters

One possible critique of Hidden Figures in terms of "time wastage" involves the use of certain subplots or secondary characters that, while interesting and adding depth to the characters’ lives, could be argued to detract from the primary focus of the narrative.

For instance, the romance subplot between Katherine Johnson and her future husband, Jim Johnson, while adding a humanizing layer to Katherine’s character, might be seen by some as diverting attention from the more central aspects of her professional achievements. The scenes depicting their relationship, while charming, do not contribute directly to the themes of racial and gender discrimination in the workplace, and might be seen as slowing down the momentum of the main plotline about Katherine’s work at NASA. The romantic scenes may not necessarily advance her professional journey or illuminate new aspects of her character that are relevant to the narrative of overcoming institutional racism and sexism.

Time Wastage Evaluation: The romance subplot could be trimmed or condensed, allowing for a tighter narrative focus on Katherine’s work and the systemic challenges she faces. However, it's worth noting that this subplot also humanizes Katherine's character and emphasizes her personal growth, so its value is subjective based on whether the viewer prefers a more streamlined or emotionally enriched portrayal of the character.

2. Extended Depictions of Institutional Racism

The film spends significant time showcasing the institutional racism that the three women face, with scenes focusing on separate bathrooms for African Americans, the struggles with white colleagues, and the subtle (and not-so-subtle) prejudices they encounter daily. While these moments are undeniably important for understanding the setting and the barriers these women had to overcome, some of these scenes may feel repetitive, particularly as the film progresses.

For instance, the recurring scenes of Katherine being forced to use a distant bathroom for black women, or the initial resistance she faces from her white colleagues when entering the predominantly white and male-dominated meetings, could be perceived as dragging out the message about systemic racism. While these instances are pivotal for setting the historical context, the repeated focus on Katherine’s struggles in this area risks undermining the film’s pacing, potentially slowing down the narrative in the middle portion.

Time Wastage Evaluation: Though these depictions are critical in communicating the realities of racism during the time period, a more concise approach to illustrating the obstacles these women faced could maintain narrative tension without overemphasizing the obstacles, especially once the audience understands the systemic issues in place.

3. The Role of the "White Savior" Character (Paul Stafford)

The character of Paul Stafford (played by Jim Parsons), a white NASA engineer who initially resists Katherine’s inclusion in critical meetings, could also be seen as a potential example of time wastage. His evolution throughout the film—from being dismissive and condescending to eventually supporting Katherine’s work—serves to highlight the internal biases of many white colleagues. However, his character arc doesn’t add much new insight once his attitude shifts.

Stafford’s character could be seen as a tool for illustrating the broader theme of overcoming racial prejudice. However, some might argue that the film spends too much time on his transformation, especially when it doesn’t significantly advance the narrative of Katherine’s own growth or the scientific breakthroughs she is making. While Stafford’s redemption story is not as central to the film as
Order Now